The Selfish Act Of Colonialism A Nascent Of English...

On answering the question, â€Å"To what extent is The Tempest â€Å"about† nascent English colonial?† I would say that this Shakespearean play is completely a nascent of English colonialism, because it’s plot is based around colonialism. The story describes white men inhabiting an island and proceed to fight for control, without any input by the natives. What makes this a story specifically about nascent English colonialism is the alluding fact that humans are power hungry, which will prove to be true within the English government when they start to invade other countries. The selfish act of colonialism is revealed through the characters Prosper, Stephano, and Trinculo. These men’s main focus is to either keep power, or to obtain it. By pay attention to the reactions and interactions with the natives, the audience can see the role that the natives play in the new neighbors’ affairs. It is clear from their interaction with Caliban that they have no intention to divide and share of power with any, but themselves. This essay will analyze the interactions between Caliban and his new neighbors and reveal how their actions are a foreshadow to those of the English colonist. The character Caliban might seem to be a little peculiar to the audience, they even might come pair him to an animal. His representation was purposeful done, because his presentation is similar to the way colonist viewed the natives of the new country. They were not viewed as people, because the colonist did not deemShow MoreRelatedGp Essay Mainpoints24643 Words   |  99 Pagesissues †¢ Citizen journalists closer to their subject matter than professional journalists †¢ Better position to uncover unique on-the-ground perspectives Mainstream GOOD: Sheer physical authenticity - reliability †¢ Cost of publishing book acts as a barrier to entry against casual writers †¢ Hardly any oversight over the quality of material that gets published via new media channels †¢ Any work, regardless of its value, can easily get broadcasted to a global audience †¢ Publishers

Essay about Ronald Dworkins Liberal Morality - 895 Words

Dworkin begins by roughly defining liberalism according to the New Deal: â€Å"It combined an emphasis on less inequality and greater economic stability with more abundant political and civil liberty for the groups campaigning for these goals.† Dworkin states that such a definition is inadequate and goes on to elaborate on liberalism in more depth. The liberal, in economic policies, demands that the inequalities of wealth be reduced through social programs such as â€Å"welfare and other redistribution financed by a progressive tax.† Liberals also take a Keynesian policy toward the governments stabilizing intervention in the economy, such as controlling inflation and unemployment. And liberals support freedom of speech, racial equality and are†¦show more content†¦The conservative â€Å"protects the commodity of liberty, valued for its own sake, more effectively† than the liberal. But unlike liberty, equality is a concept that can be shown, and because o f this, it can be stated that conservatives do in fact favor equality less and liberals more. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Two concepts of equality must be distinguished according to Dworkin: the first is that the government should treat all its citizens, or all those that are in its charge as equals, and the second principle of equality requires that the government treat all of those in its charge equally in â€Å"the distribution of some resource of opportunity.† Liberals sense of equality will fall more into the latter idea of equality. The conservative feels that, treating citizens as equals, as the liberals see equality, would amount to treating the citizens in fact as unequal. The most efficient means of helping the least well off in fact is the free market, and not the government’s redistribution of wealth. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;But then what does it mean for the government to treat its citizens as equals? The first â€Å"supposes that government must be neutral on what might be called the good life,† and the second one supposes â€Å"that government cannot treat its citizens as equal human beings without a theory of what human beings out to be.† The first theory states that because every citizen has a differentShow MoreRelated Dworkins Wishful-Thinkers Constitution Essay2865 Words   |  12 PagesAbortion Rights as Religious Freedom, I argue against Ronald Dworkins liberal view of constitutional interpretation while rejecting the originalism of Justices Scalia and Bork. I champion the view that Justice Black presents in his dissent in Griswold v. Connecticut. INTRODUCTION In Lifes Dominion Ronald Dworkin uses a liberal interpretation of the Constitution to defend constitutional rights to abortion and euthanasia. (1) According to Dworkin, the Constitution lays down general, comprehensiveRead MoreDifference Between Liberal And Difference Feminism1843 Words   |  8 PagesKing, 1 Sheridan Louise King Midterm POL192b: Legal Theory 1. What is the difference between liberal and difference feminism? In order to differentiate liberal feminism from difference feminism, it is important to clarify on the outset the exact definition of each term. According to Martha Fineman (2005), feminism can be defined as a gender based theory focusing on challenging the assertions and assumption revolving gender neutrality. Specifically, feminism deals with the assumptions and valuesRead MorePorn and Censorship15240 Words   |  61 PagesPornography and Censorship Should the government be allowed to legitimately prohibit citizens from publishing or viewing pornography, or would this be an unjustified violation of basic freedoms? Traditionally, liberals defended the freedom of consenting adults to publish and consume pornography in private from moral and religious conservatives who wanted pornography banned for its obscenity, its corrupting impact on consumers and its corrosive effect on traditional family and religious values. ButRead MoreEssay about Tolerance, Liberalism, and Community3324 Words   |  14 PagesCommunity ABSTRACT: The liberal principle of tolerance limits the use of coercion by a commitment to the broadest possible toleration of rival religious and moral conceptions of the worthy way of life. While accepting the communitarian insight that moral thought is necessarily rooted in a social self with conceptions of the good, I argue that this does not undermine liberal tolerance. There is no thickly detailed way of life so embedded in our self-conceptions that liberal neutrality is blocked atRead MorePHL 612: Philosophy of Law5882 Words   |  24 Pages*Other times may be available by appointment Website: Blackboard course website available through my.ryerson.ca This is an Upper Level Liberal Studies course Course Description: PHL 612 Philosophy of Law [Calendar Description]: What is law? What makes something a legal norm? Should citizens always obey the law? What is the relationship between law and morality? This course will explore competing theories of law, such as natural law and positivism, and touch on crucial debates over civil disobedienceRead More Amartya Sens What is Equality? Essays3903 Words   |  16 Pagesmodified version of Rawls’ theory which takes primary social goods as that which is to be distributed but which demands a Basic Rights principle that insures basic subsistent rights (as well as basic security rights) as the most fundamental principle of morality (and social justice), and then demands that Rawls’ Difference Principle be applied lexically to the ‘material’ goods of income, wealth, and leisure time, but done so that the social basis of self-respect is never undermined. Since Amartya Sen’sRead MoreThe Uk Judiciary1960 Words   |  8 Pageslaw, however they do not acknowledge that a corrupt state could oppress its people using laws which are immoral and unfair. Lon Fuller and Ronald Dworkin are advocates of the substantive school of thought, they argue that purpose of the rule of law is far more than simply providing a clear framework of laws in that it should also possess an ‘internal morality’ and provide protection for individuals against fellow individuals and the State. Substantive theorists criticise the Formalist theories andRead MoreThe Problem Of Global Justice Essay2336 Words   |  10 Pagesan enabling condition: he saw, in the international arena, separate sovereigns facing each other in a state of war, from which both justice and injustice are absent. Whereas the issue of justice and equality proposed by John Rawls claims that the liberal requirements of justice include a substantial component of equality among cit izens, but that this is a specifically political demand, which apply the structure of a unified nation-state. Egalitarian justice is a prerequisite on the internal politicalRead MoreAdministrative Law, Red and Green Light Theories5307 Words   |  22 Pagesunderstood law as properly isolated from its social context, ‘endowed with its own discrete, integral history, its own â€Å"science†, and its own values, which are all treated as a single block sealed off from general social history, from politics, and from morality’.7 Barker confirms that a similar outlook obtained amongst political scientists. While the political consequences of ‘particular laws and particular legal judgments’ met with occasional recognition, the character of the judicial system and the general

Business process outsourcing Free Essays

The objective is to develop a software for BPO management system. Business process outsourcing (BPO) is a subset of outsourcing that involves the contracting of the operations and responsibilities of specific business functions (or processes) to a third-party service provider. BPO management system is used to effectively manage the business activities of a BPO organisation. We will write a custom essay sample on Business process outsourcing or any similar topic only for you Order Now This system adopts a comprehensive approach to minimize the manual work and schedule resources, time in a cogent manner. It is designed for hiring any company, that is , it is generalised system for business process management. The core of the system is to maintain employee details and customer details and company details. Employee details include id, name, address, shift timings, category (based on the field of expertise), number of calls attended and salary details. Salary increment and perks (employee benefits) for each employee will be done in the end of the month depending upon the number of calls attended for that given month. Employees recruited for various companies will be trained according to their expertise and will be given knowledge about the other departments also so that they can handle the calls of other department when they are idle. Customer details include name, phone number, address, area of complaint or area of doubt. For a complaint registered for more than a given span of the time (say 15 days, depending on the hiring company) the complaint will be logged into a separate file for immediate processing. Company details include the name of the company, number of employees working for the company and the contract details. How to cite Business process outsourcing, Essay examples

Homosexual Issues Essay Example For Students

Homosexual Issues Essay How America should react to homosexuals? How America should react to homosexualsMany experts agree that homosexuality has existed as long as human beingsthemselves, although the attitude towards them has undergone dramatic changes insome countries. Accepted by many societies during Greek and Roman era, most ofthe time homosexuals were considered to be sinners against nature and evencriminals. In Medieval and modern periods homosexuals were prosecuted. Enlightenment brought some liberation, substituting death penalty byimprisonment. In Nazi Germany so-called doctors tried tocure gays by the ways of castration and extreme intimidation. Until1973 attempts to find a cure against homosexuality, what by majority was viewedas a disease, were continued. Today, when research on twins suggests that sexualorientation is not a choice, but our genetic predisposition, homosexual acts arestill considered to be immoral and even illegal in majority of countries and inthe eyes of most religious groups homosexuals, probably, always will be thesubjects of anathema. As much as the future may look gloomy for many gays andlesbians all over the world, there are remarkable changes in public opinion andofficials attitudes toward homosexuals in some countries. For example, in1989 Denmark was the first to allow the same-sex marriage. In the United Statesthe subject of homosexuality remains controversial. For example, In Hawaii threehomosexual couples asked t he court to recognize their right to get married andthe court did. However, the state government refused to legalize this marriage. Consequently, a new amendment was introduced to the state Constitution. At thesame time, majority of the states are not even considering this option andhomosexuality itself is still illegal there. Still, not only authorities try todetermine the position they should take towards homosexuals, many commonAmericans also have no clear understanding of how to react to homosexuality. Whyshould we bother to find the answer to the questions: who are the homosexualsand where do they belong in our society? First of all, it is important torealize that homosexuals are an integral part of our society. Your neighbor,your co-worker, your hairdresser, your child and even your spouse can be one ofthem. According to Richard D. Mohr wo out of five men one passes on thestreet have had orgasmic sex with men. Every second family in the country has amember who is essentially homosexual and many more people regularly havehomosexual experiences(186). Should we avoid them, ignore, express ouranger and disgust? Unfortunately, many people feel that way because they have aremote idea about people of different sexual orientation. For them homosexualityis perversion, abnormality or decease. The ignorance may foster fear, which inits turn leads to hostility. Homophobia is dangerous, because it affects allgroups of people ? heterosexuals and homosexuals, grown-ups and children, menand women. It may lead to violence and even death. There are numerous cases whenpeople were actually killed because of homophobia. To name few of them ?Matthew Shepard(homosexual), John Braun (heterosexual), Steve Kennedy(homosexual) and the list can be continued. Prejudice against homosexualitysharply limits how all men and women may acceptably behave, among themselves andwith each other. It is obvious that we can no longer pretend that the homosexualissue is none of our concern. In attempt to evaluate our attitude towards peopleof different sexual orientation we will be able to understand them better. Whatis more im portant, we may overcome our prejudice, which often results indiscrimination of one group against another. To acknowledge that there arepeople who are different and learn to tolerate them means to live in a saferworld. The next question is: Do we have the right to discriminate againsthomosexuals? Until recently homosexuals were invisible minority. Therefore, manyAmericans were unaware that gays and lesbians were discriminated against. Buthomosexuals were and still are treated unfairly on the basis that they undermineour morality, that they present danger to our children and that they aretransmitters of AIDS far more than heterosexuals. Today many gays and lesbianscome out of the closet and demand the same rights that heterosexualtake for granted. We have to admit that some steps have been made to protecthomosexuals. However, many government and public institutions and individualsstill discriminate against homosexuals denying them employment, housing,insurance, marriage, childs custo dy and so on. Why is it allowed todiscriminate against people who have different sexual orientation? Some may putforward arguments that being gay is immoral, that it is illegal, that it is asin against nature and violation of Gods law and, some people considerhomosexual variety proof of existence of Satan . Some homophobics qualifyhomosexual behavior akin to lying and stealing and, therefore, support the ideathat gays and lesbians deserve to suffer. As Pete Hamill points out,gay-bashing is real; homosexuals are routinely injured or murderedevery day, all over the world, by people who fear or hate their version of humansexuality(532). But as was mentioned above, the medical studies confirmthat being gay is not a matter of choice or preference, but a deviation fromnormal sexuality, which lays in genes and hardly can be changed. Given a choicemany would have preferred not to be homosexual. It is hard to imagine thesomebody would voluntary give up all the privileges of being straight a ndsubject himself to harassment, discrimination, assaults and scorn. Some arguethat the homosexual act is unnatural since it is not procreative. Then whydont we discriminate against sterile couples or those of over childbearingage? Others express their concern that by granting homosexuals rights we willgive our blessing to other forms of sexual perversions such polygamy andpedophillia, for example. Here it is important to notice, that for one,pedophillia is not necessary a homosexual act. Secondly, it is immoral andunlawful because one of the partners in this case is a child or a teenager whomore often than not has no other choice than to yield to the power of the adult. Essay on Society's Role in Child Labour EssaySo, instead of burdening ourselves with unnecessary tension by rejecting them,we have to adjust our apprehension, accept them for who there are and treat themfairly. By doing so we will reduce violence, hate crime and stress. Is it not agood reason to overcome the last of our prejudices?Bibliography1. Francoeur, Robert T. Should Society Recognize Gay Marriages?Taking sides: Clashing Views on controversial Issues. 2. Issues in HumanSexuality. 4th Ed. Stephen Satris: The Dushkin Publishing Group, Inc,Guilford,1994:246-247. 3. Geraci, Joseph and Donald H. Mader. Pedophillia.Encyclopedia of Homosexuality Ed. 4. Wayne R Dynes. Garland Publishing, Inc ,New York, 1990: v2, 964-970. 5. Hamill, Pete. Confessions of aHeterosexual. The Aims of Argument. A Rhetoric and Reader. 2nd Ed. TimothyW. Crusius and Carolyn E. Chanell: Mayfield Publishing, Mountain View,California,1998: 531-536. 6. Mohr, Richard D. Gay Basics: Some Questions,Facts, and Values . Taking sides: Clashing Views on controversial Issues. Moral Issues. 4th Ed. Stephen Satris: The Dushkin Publishing Group, Inc,Guilford,1994:186-194. 7. Nickel, Jeffrey. Everybodys Threatened byHomophobia. The Aims of Argument. A Rhetoric and Reader.2nd Ed. Timothy W. Crusius and Carolyn E. Chanell: Mayfield Publishing, Mountain View, California,1998:527-530. 8. Schuklenk,Udo and Tony Riley. Homosexuality, SocialAttitudes Toward. Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics. Editor-in -Chief RuthChadwick. Academic Press: San Diego, 1998: v2, 597-603. 9. Ulanowsky, Carole. The Family. Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics. Editor-in-Chief RuthChadwick. Academic Press: San Diego, 1998: v2,